But wait! Weren't we hearing the opposite?
However, that is the conclusion presented in the abstract of the Yale University study "The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change"
"The conventional explanation for controversy over climate change emphasizes impediments to public understanding: Limited popular knowledge of science, the inability of ordinary citizens to assess technical information, and the resulting widespread use of unreliable cognitive heuristics to assess risk. A large survey of U.S. adults (N = 1540) found little support for this account. On the whole, the most scientifically literate and numerate subjects were slightly less likely, not more, to see climate change as a serious threat than the least scientifically literate and numerate ones."
H/t & more at "The Volokh Conspiracy" legal blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment