The immediate threat, of course,
is the HHS (Health and Human Services) mandate requiring Catholic institutions
and Catholic employers to include coverage of contraceptives, sterilizations,
and abortifacient drugs in the health insurance offered to their employees. The
legal challenges mounted against this obvious violation of the first freedom,
religious freedom, may well be vindicated. But with Obamacare now seemingly set
in concrete, the Church will face a host of such implementing
"mandates" and it will be imperative to contest those that are
morally unacceptable, time and time again. Authentically Catholic health care
in America is now in mortal danger, and it is going to take a concerted effort
to save it for future generations.
A further threat comes from the gay
insurgency, which will press the administration to find some way to federalize
the marriage issue and to compel acceptance of the chimera of "gay
marriage." Thus it seems important to accelerate a serious debate within
American Catholicism on whether the Church ought not pre-emptively withdraw
from the civil marriage business, its clergy declining to act as agents of
government in witnessing marriages for purposes of state law.
If the Church were to take this
dramatic step now, it would be acting prophetically: it would be challenging
the state (and the culture) by underscoring that what the state means by
"marriage" and what Catholics mean by "marriage" are
radically different, and that what the state means by " marriage"
is wrong. If, however, the Church is forced to take this step after "gay
marriage" is the law of the land, Catholics will be pilloried as bad
losers who've picked up their marbles and fled the game — and any witness-value
to the Church's withdrawal from the civil marriage business will be lost. Many
thoughtful young priests are discussing this dramatic option among themselves;
it's time for the rest of the Church to join the conversation. ...
GEORGE WEIGEL
GEORGE WEIGEL
No comments:
Post a Comment